Unlike
other universities, the curriculum of my career has a rather critical approach.
This means that it questions the dominant methodologies that do
not seek a significant change in society, but turn the profession into a cog in
the system. For this reason, Social Work at the University of Chile prioritizes
research in order to develop good practice. This conception of social work is
what I like most about my career and at the moment I would not change it.
During the
pandemic all courses were online. Today some courses that aim to teach students
how to write academically are still taught online, but the professors do not
give presentations at a distance, they write e-mails with the instructions for
the activities. The distance between professors and students that these
dynamics generate makes learning difficult and that is why I would reinstate
these courses to the face-to-face modality.
Regarding
the facilities of the faculty, it can be pointed out that we do not have a
place to eat that protects us from the cold or heat, there are very few
microwaves and when it rains there are many leaks. Also some rooms are very
small in proportion to the number of students. The classes held in the computer
labs do not have enough computers for all students, so we are divided into two
rooms and those who do not arrive on time to the room where the teacher is,
must watch the class in a place where a video and audio is projected. This real
distance facilitates lack of concentration and makes learning difficult. The
infrastructure is quite precarious compared to other faculties with higher
incomes. I would change that without a doubt.


